May 2012
3 tags
1 tag
I JUST WANT TO THROW ONE FINAL POST UP because we just got a couple more thoughtful responses and I’d like to share them! After this I am declaring this case closed, haha. Back to your scheduled crushes!
Thank you all again for your feedback and support![[MORE]]
awalkinthefall asked:
Just to add an opinion to the discussion on the somewhat questionable history crushes, I think it maybe...
1 tag
MOD #2 HERE NOW I’m just gonna take down that Goebbels post. While I see both sides to the argument, in the end I just don’t think the drama posts like that cause is worth it.
I’d advise you all to read our other mods post about the situation here, because I think she makes some good points and we do encourage feedback!
That being said, there really are two sides to this...
exclusionzone asked: As a person with an historical crush on a "questionable" historical figure, I know that such affections are not defined by modern conceptions of acceptability, nor are they products of rational, conscious thought; they simply manifest themselves and tighten their grip with every attempt to suppress them. I believe it is our right to crush on anyone our subconscious clings to and I am...
flutiebear asked: Usually I'm a huge fan of FuckYeahHistoryCrushes, but between this post of Goebbels as crushworthy and the recent one of Stalin... I dunno, I'm just kinda grossed out by it all. I'm left wondering at what point do you as mod make the judgment call and say, "I don't care if some readers find this historical figure pleasing to look at; he was a massive dillhole within living...
3 tags
victorianfresh asked: I've taken the liberty of editing your Sherman description: "William Tecumseh Sherman (February 8, 1820 – February 14, 1891) Professional badass and completely out of his mind"
3 tags
2 tags
2 tags
3 tags
3 tags
3 tags
3 tags
6 tags
4 tags
3 tags
